communication: be important in sport

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in sport 1.00
be used in sport 0.94
be important in sports 0.90
be important in football 0.82
be important in soccer 0.81
be important in tennis 0.80
be important in organisation 0.80
be important in georgraphy 0.80
be critical concern to sport managers 0.80
be important in team 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fundamental, be important in sports)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(communication, be important in sport)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(department, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(communication, be important in sport)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(fundamental, be important in sports)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(department, be important in organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(fundamental, be important in sports)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(department, be important in organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be important in tennis)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be important in football)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be important in sports)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be important in soccer)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be used in sport)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be important in sport)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fundamental, be important in sports)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in sport)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(department, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in sport)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(coordination, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(coordination, be important in sport)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(coordination, be used in sport)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(coordination, be used in sport)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(coordination, be important in sports)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(coordination, be important in sports)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(coordination, be important in tennis)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(coordination, be important in tennis)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(coordination, be important in football)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(coordination, be important in football)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(coordination, be important in soccer)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(coordination, be important in soccer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(communication, be important in sport)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(communication, be critical concern to sport managers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(communication, be critical concern to sport managers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(communication, be critical concern to sport managers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(communication, be critical concern to sport managers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in sport)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(communication, be important in sport)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(department, be important in organisation)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fundamental, be important in sports)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(coordination, be used in sport)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(coordination, be important in sport)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(coordination, be important in tennis)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(coordination, be important in football)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(coordination, be important in sports)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(coordination, be important in soccer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fundamental, be important in sports)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(communication, be important in sport)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(department, be important in organisation)