communication: be critical concern to sport managers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be critical concern to sport managers 1.00
be important in sport 0.80
be important in quality management 0.78
be important in team 0.76
be important in sports 0.76
be important in organisation 0.76
be important in georgraphy 0.76
be important to team 0.75
be important for business 0.75
be important in business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fundamental, be important in sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(communication, be critical concern to sport managers)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(department, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(communication, be critical concern to sport managers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(department, be important in organisation)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(fundamental, be important in sports)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(fundamental, be important in sports)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(department, be important in organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be important in sports)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(acknowledgement, be important to team)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be important in sport)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fundamental, be important in sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(communication, be critical concern to sport managers)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(department, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(communication, be critical concern to sport managers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(coordination, be important in sport) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(coordination, be important in sport)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(acknowledgement, be important to team) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(acknowledgement, be important to team)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(coordination, be important in sports) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(coordination, be important in sports)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(communication, be critical concern to sport managers)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(communication, be important in sport)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(communication, be important in sport)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in sport)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(communication, be important in business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(communication, be important in business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in business)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in sport)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(communication, be critical concern to sport managers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(communication, be critical concern to sport managers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(department, be important in organisation)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fundamental, be important in sports)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(coordination, be important in sport)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(coordination, be important in sports)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(acknowledgement, be important to team)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(department, be important in organisation)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(communication, be critical concern to sport managers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fundamental, be important in sports)