communication: be important skill in science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important skill in science 1.00
is important skill 0.93
is good skill 0.91
is most important skill 0.90
is skill 0.90
is important leadership skill 0.88
be important in science 0.87
have important skills 0.87
is leadership skill 0.86
is valuable workplace skill 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(failure, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(communication, be important skill in science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(communication, be important skill in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(failure, be important in science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important skill in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(failure, be important in science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(failure, be important in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(communication, be important skill in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(communication, be important skill in science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(communication, be important skill in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(communication, be important skill in science)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(communication, be important skill in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(communication, is skill)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(communication, be important skill in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(communication, is skill)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(communication, be important skill in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(communication, be important in science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(communication, be important skill in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(communication, is valuable workplace skill)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(communication, be important skill in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(communication, is skill)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(communication, be important skill in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(communication, be important in science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(communication, be important skill in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(communication, be important in science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(communication, be important skill in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(communication, is valuable workplace skill)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(communication, be important skill in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(communication, is skill)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(communication, be important skill in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(communication, is valuable workplace skill)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(communication, be important skill in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important in science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(communication, be important skill in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(communication, is valuable workplace skill)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(communication, be important skill in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(communication, be important skill in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important skill in science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(communication, be important skill in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(communication, be important skill in science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(communication, be important skill in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(failure, be important in science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(communication, be important skill in science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(failure, be important in science)