communication: is difficult

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
is difficult 1.00
be difficult for people 0.93
is online difficult 0.88
is hard 0.82
be regarded as difficult 0.82
is complicated 0.81
be within cultures difficult 0.79
is painful 0.77
be important in organisation 0.76
be important in georgraphy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(department, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(communication, is difficult)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(failure, is painful)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(communication, is difficult)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(failure, is hard)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(communication, is difficult)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(failure, is hard)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(failure, is painful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(department, be important in organisation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(failure, is hard)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(department, be important in organisation)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(failure, is painful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(department, be important in organisation)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(communication, is difficult)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(failure, is painful)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(communication, is difficult)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(failure, is hard)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(communication, is difficult)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(communication, is difficult)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(communication, be difficult for people)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(communication, be difficult for people)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(communication, be difficult for people)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(communication, be regarded as difficult)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(communication, be regarded as difficult)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(communication, be regarded as difficult)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(communication, be regarded as difficult)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(communication, be difficult for people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(communication, is difficult)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(communication, is difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(failure, is hard)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(failure, is painful)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(department, be important in organisation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(failure, is hard)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(failure, is painful)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(communication, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(department, be important in organisation)