communication: be regarded as difficult

Related concepts

Parents	fundamental Weight: 0.64 , department Weight: 0.62 , gap Weight: 0.61 , failure Weight: 0.61
Siblings	coordination Weight: 0.57 , solicitation Weight: 0.54 , broadcasting Weight: 0.53 , acknowledgement Weight: 0.51 , infrared Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be regarded as difficult	1.00
be regarded as complex	0.90
be regarded as essence	0.84
be considered as good thing	0.84
be considered as thing	0.83
is difficult	0.82
be regarded as essence of management	0.82
be considered as process	0.81
be considered as multi-dimensional process	0.81
be seen as easy major	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.18

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(communication, be regarded as difficult)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(failure, be considered as good thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(communication, be regarded as difficult)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Plausible(failure, be considered as good thing)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(failure, be considered as thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as good thing)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(coordination, be regarded as essence)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(coordination, be regarded as essence of management)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(communication, be regarded as difficult)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(failure, be considered as good thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(communication, be regarded as difficult)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(coordination, be regarded as essence) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(coordination, be regarded as essence)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(coordination, be regarded as essence of management) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(coordination, be regarded as essence of management)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Salient(communication, be regarded as difficult)

Similarity expansion

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(communication, be considered as process)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(communication, be regarded as complex)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(communication, be considered as process)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(communication, be regarded as complex)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Salient(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(communication, is difficult)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(communication, be considered as process)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(communication, is difficult)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(communication, be regarded as complex)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(communication, is difficult)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Salient(communication, is difficult)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(communication, be regarded as complex)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered as process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.53

Salient(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(communication, be regarded as difficult)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(communication, be regarded as difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(failure, be considered as good thing)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(failure, be considered as thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(coordination, be regarded as essence)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(coordination, be regarded as essence of management)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(failure, be considered as good thing)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.73

Typical(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(failure, be considered as thing)