failure: be considered as thing

Related concepts

Parents	mistake Weight: 0.67 , breach Weight: 0.65 , disappointment Weight: 0.61 , obstacle Weight: 0.61
Siblings	heart failure Weight: 0.77 , omission Weight: 0.66 , negligence Weight: 0.61 , communication Weight: 0.61 , flat tire Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered as thing	1.00
be considered as good thing	0.97
is even thing	0.90
is thing	0.89
is good thing	0.87
be thought as as process	0.85
be considered as process	0.85
be considered as multi-dimensional process	0.85
is same thing	0.84
be regarded as difficult	0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(disappointment, is thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(failure, be considered as thing)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(disappointment, is good thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(failure, be considered as thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Plausible(disappointment, is good thing)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(disappointment, is thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(disappointment, is good thing)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(disappointment, is thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(communication, be regarded as difficult)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered as process)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(disappointment, is thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(failure, be considered as thing)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.00

Plausible(disappointment, is good thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(failure, be considered as thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(communication, be considered as process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(communication, be considered as process)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(communication, be regarded as difficult) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(communication, be regarded as difficult)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(failure, be considered as thing)

Similarity expansion

0.83

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Plausible(failure, be considered as good thing)

0.83

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Salient(failure, be considered as good thing)

0.83

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as good thing)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.13

Typical(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(failure, be considered as good thing)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Plausible(failure, is good thing)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.13

Typical(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(failure, is thing)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Salient(failure, is good thing)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(failure, is good thing)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(failure, is thing)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.13

Typical(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(failure, is good thing)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.13

Typical(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(failure, is same thing)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(failure, is same thing)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Salient(failure, is same thing)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(failure, is thing)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(failure, is same thing)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(failure, is thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.14

Salient(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(failure, be considered as thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(disappointment, is thing)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(disappointment, is good thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(communication, be considered as process)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(communication, be regarded as difficult)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.13

Typical(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(disappointment, is thing)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.13

Typical(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(disappointment, is good thing)