communication: be considered as process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered as process 1.00
be considered as multi-dimensional process 1.00
be considered process 0.98
be thought as as process 0.92
be considered in two way process 0.92
be called process 0.91
be referred as process 0.91
be described as process 0.91
be thought of of process 0.89
describe as process 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(communication, be considered as process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(communication, be considered as process)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(communication, be considered as process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(communication, be considered as process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered process)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(communication, be considered as process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(communication, be considered process)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(communication, be considered as process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered in two way process)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(communication, be considered as process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(communication, be considered as process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(communication, be considered as process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(communication, be considered process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(communication, be considered as process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(communication, be considered in two way process)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(communication, be considered as process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(communication, be considered as process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered in two way process)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(communication, be considered as process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(communication, be considered in two way process)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(communication, be considered as process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(communication, be considered as process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(communication, be considered as process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered as process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(communication, be considered as process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(communication, be considered as process)