communication: be considered in two way process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered in two way process 1.00
be considered as process 0.92
be considered as multi-dimensional process 0.92
be considered process 0.92
be thought of of process 0.88
be thought as as process 0.87
be called process 0.87
has physical part process 0.84
be considered as thing 0.83
be referred as process 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(communication, be considered in two way process)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(failure, be considered as thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered in two way process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(communication, be considered in two way process)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered as process)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered process)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(communication, be considered as process)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(communication, be considered process)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(communication, has physical part process)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(communication, be considered as process)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(communication, be considered process)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered as process)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(communication, has physical part process)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(communication, has physical part process)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(communication, has physical part process)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered in two way process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(communication, be considered in two way process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(failure, be considered as thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(communication, be considered in two way process) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(failure, be considered as thing)