communication: be considered process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered process 1.00
be considered as process 0.98
be considered as multi-dimensional process 0.98
be called process 0.93
be considered in two way process 0.92
be thought of of process 0.90
be referred as process 0.88
be described as process 0.88
be thought as as process 0.88
has physical part process 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(communication, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(communication, be considered process)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(communication, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(communication, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered as process)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(communication, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(communication, be considered as process)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(communication, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered in two way process)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(communication, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(communication, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(communication, has physical part process)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(communication, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered as process)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(communication, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(communication, be considered as process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(communication, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(communication, be considered in two way process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(communication, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered in two way process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(communication, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(communication, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(communication, has physical part process)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(communication, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(communication, be considered in two way process)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(communication, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(communication, has physical part process)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(communication, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(communication, has physical part process)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(communication, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(communication, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(communication, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(communication, be considered process)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(communication, be considered process)