communication: be regarded as complex

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fundamental
Weight: 0.64
, department
Weight: 0.62
, gap
Weight: 0.61
, failure
Weight: 0.61
Siblings coordination
Weight: 0.57
, solicitation
Weight: 0.54
, broadcasting
Weight: 0.53
, acknowledgement
Weight: 0.51
, infrared
Weight: 0.50

Related properties

Property Similarity
be regarded as complex 1.00
be regarded as difficult 0.90
be regarded as essence 0.82
be regarded as essence of management 0.82
be considered as process 0.81
be considered as multi-dimensional process 0.81
has state complex 0.80
be described as process 0.80
be considered as thing 0.79
be considered as multidimensional process 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(communication, be regarded as complex)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(failure, be considered as thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(failure, be considered as thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be regarded as essence)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(coordination, be regarded as essence of management)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(failure, be considered as thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(communication, be regarded as complex)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(coordination, be regarded as essence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(coordination, be regarded as essence)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(coordination, be regarded as essence of management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(coordination, be regarded as essence of management)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(communication, be regarded as complex)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(communication, be regarded as difficult)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(communication, be regarded as difficult)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(communication, be considered as process)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered as process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(communication, be considered as process)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(communication, be regarded as difficult)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(communication, has state complex)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(communication, be regarded as difficult)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(communication, be considered as process)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(communication, has state complex)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(communication, be considered as multi-dimensional process)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(communication, has state complex)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(communication, has state complex)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(communication, be regarded as complex)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(communication, be regarded as complex)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(failure, be considered as thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(coordination, be regarded as essence)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(coordination, be regarded as essence of management)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(communication, be regarded as complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(failure, be considered as thing)