communist: have good music

Related concepts

Parents	socialist Weight: 0.63 , political party Weight: 0.63 , political ideology Weight: 0.61 , time Weight: 0.56 , group Weight: 0.54
Siblings	communism Weight: 0.37 , democratic party Weight: 0.36 , liberal party Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
have good music	1.00
has quality good	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(communist, have good music)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(group, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(communist, have good music)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(communist, have good music) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(group, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(communist, have good music) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(communist, have good music) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(group, has quality good)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(communist, have good music) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(communist, have good music) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Remarkable(communism, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(communist, have good music) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(liberal party, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(time, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(communist, have good music) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(communist, have good music)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(group, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(communist, have good music) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(communist, have good music)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(communist, have good music) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

Remarkable(liberal party, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(liberal party, has quality good)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(communist, have good music) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

Remarkable(communism, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(communism, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(communist, have good music) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(communist, have good music)

Similarity expansion

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(communist, have good music) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(communist, has quality good)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(communist, have good music) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Salient(communist, has quality good)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(communist, have good music) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(communist, has quality good)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(communist, have good music) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(communist, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(communist, have good music) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(communist, have good music) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(communist, have good music)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(communist, have good music) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(communist, have good music)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(communist, have good music) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(group, has quality good)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(communist, have good music) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(communist, have good music) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(communism, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(communist, have good music) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(liberal party, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(communist, have good music) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(group, has quality good)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

Typical(communist, have good music) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(time, has quality good)