company: be in business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents oil company
Weight: 0.70
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.68
, law firm
Weight: 0.68
, operator
Weight: 0.61
Siblings software company
Weight: 0.87
, advertising agency
Weight: 0.70
, conglomerate
Weight: 0.68
, department store
Weight: 0.68
, accounting firm
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in business 1.00
do business 0.92
keep in business 0.90
go into business 0.88
go out of business 0.88
stay in business 0.88
be better form of business 0.86
go into international business 0.84
have business events 0.84
engage in business 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(department store, go out of business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(department store, go out of business)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(department store, go out of business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(company, be in business)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(company, be in business)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(company, do business)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(company, be in business)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(company, keep in business)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(company, go into business)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(company, go out of business)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(company, be better form of business)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(company, have business events)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(company, be in business)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(company, engage in business)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(company, keep in business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(company, go out of business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(company, do business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(company, engage in business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(company, keep in business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(company, do business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(company, go into business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(company, keep in business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(company, do business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(company, engage in business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(company, have business events)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(company, be better form of business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(company, engage in business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(company, have business events)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(company, have business events)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(company, go into business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(company, go out of business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(company, go into business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(company, be better form of business)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(company, go out of business)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(company, be better form of business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(company, be in business)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(company, be in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(company, be in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(company, be in business)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(department store, go out of business)