compete: causes engage in competition with others

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.53
, competitor
Weight: 0.45
, statement
Weight: 0.42
, horse
Weight: 0.24
, competition
Weight: 0.20
Siblings tap
Weight: 0.30
, leverage
Weight: 0.30
, opportunity
Weight: 0.29
, experience
Weight: 0.29
, stick
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
causes engage in competition with others 1.00
causes competition 0.84
requires enter competition 0.83
requires competition 0.81
earn money in competition 0.78
lose competition to good competitor 0.78
compete in race 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(compete, causes engage in competition with others)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(compete, causes engage in competition with others)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(compete, causes engage in competition with others)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(compete, causes engage in competition with others)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(compete, causes engage in competition with others)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(compete, causes engage in competition with others)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(compete, causes engage in competition with others)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(compete, causes engage in competition with others)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(compete, causes competition)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(compete, causes engage in competition with others)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(compete, requires competition)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(compete, causes engage in competition with others)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(compete, requires enter competition)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(compete, causes engage in competition with others)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(compete, causes competition)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(compete, causes engage in competition with others)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(compete, requires enter competition)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(compete, causes engage in competition with others)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(compete, requires competition)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(compete, causes engage in competition with others)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(compete, requires enter competition)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(compete, causes engage in competition with others)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(compete, causes competition)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(compete, causes engage in competition with others)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(compete, requires enter competition)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(compete, causes engage in competition with others)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(compete, causes competition)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(compete, causes engage in competition with others)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(compete, requires competition)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(compete, causes engage in competition with others)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(compete, requires competition)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(compete, causes engage in competition with others)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(compete, causes engage in competition with others)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(compete, causes engage in competition with others)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(compete, causes engage in competition with others)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(compete, causes engage in competition with others)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(compete, causes engage in competition with others)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(compete, causes engage in competition with others)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)