competitor: lose competition to good competitor

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.58
, advantage
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
, other person
Weight: 0.56
Siblings player
Weight: 0.69
, target
Weight: 0.62
, supplier
Weight: 0.60
, intel
Weight: 0.60
, athlete
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
lose competition to good competitor 1.00
lose competition 0.93
be very competitive 0.82
prepare for competition 0.81
be compete 0.80
lose game 0.76
win sport event 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(athlete, lose competition)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(athlete, lose game)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(athlete, prepare for competition)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(athlete, be very competitive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(athlete, be compete)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(player, win sport event)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(athlete, lose competition)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(athlete, lose competition)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(athlete, be very competitive)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(athlete, be very competitive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(athlete, prepare for competition)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(athlete, prepare for competition)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(player, win sport event)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(player, win sport event)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(athlete, be compete)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(athlete, be compete)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(athlete, lose game)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(athlete, lose game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(athlete, be compete)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(athlete, lose competition)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(athlete, prepare for competition)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(player, win sport event)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(athlete, be very competitive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(competitor, lose competition to good competitor)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(athlete, lose game)