competition: be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.71
, pressure
Weight: 0.63
, force
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.59
, situation
Weight: 0.59
Siblings tournament
Weight: 0.64
, auction
Weight: 0.64
, olympic games
Weight: 0.63
, water polo
Weight: 0.60
, dart
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly 1.00
be better than monopoly 0.89
be similar to monopolistic competition 0.83
limited in oligopoly 0.80
be good for society 0.77
be bad for society 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(competition, be better than monopoly)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(competition, be similar to monopolistic competition)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(competition, limited in oligopoly)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(competition, be good for society)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(competition, be better than monopoly)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(competition, be similar to monopolistic competition)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(competition, limited in oligopoly)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(competition, be good for society)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(competition, be better than monopoly)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(competition, be good for society)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(competition, be good for society)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(competition, be similar to monopolistic competition)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(competition, be better than monopoly)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(competition, be similar to monopolistic competition)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(competition, limited in oligopoly)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(competition, limited in oligopoly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly)