competition: be good for society

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.71
, pressure
Weight: 0.63
, force
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.59
, situation
Weight: 0.59
Siblings tournament
Weight: 0.64
, auction
Weight: 0.64
, olympic games
Weight: 0.63
, water polo
Weight: 0.60
, dart
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for society 1.00
be bad for society 0.97
help society 0.91
be good in life 0.83
be good for buisinesses 0.81
be bad for economy 0.79
be important in life 0.78
be in business good 0.77
be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly 0.77
make us better 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(force, be important in life)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(competition, be good for society)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(competition, be good for society)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(force, be important in life)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(competition, be good for society)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(force, be important in life)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(force, be important in life)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(competition, be good for society)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(competition, be good for society)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(competition, be good for society)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(competition, be good for society)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(competition, be good for society)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(competition, be good for society)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(competition, be good for buisinesses)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(competition, be good for society)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(competition, make us better)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(competition, be good for society)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(competition, make us better)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(competition, be good for society)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(competition, be good for society)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(competition, be good for buisinesses)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(competition, be good for society)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(competition, be good for society)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(competition, make us better)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(competition, be good for society)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(competition, be as model better for society than unregulated monopoly)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(competition, be good for society)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(competition, make us better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(competition, be good for society)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(competition, be good for buisinesses)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(competition, be good for society)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(competition, be good for buisinesses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(competition, be good for society)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(competition, be good for society)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(competition, be good for society)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(competition, be good for society)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(competition, be good for society)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(competition, be good for society)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(force, be important in life)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(competition, be good for society)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(force, be important in life)