competitors: eat asparagus

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
eat asparagus 1.00
eat tilapia 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(competitors, eat asparagus)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(competitors, eat asparagus)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(competitors, eat asparagus)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(competitors, eat tilapia)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(competitors, eat asparagus)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(competitors, eat tilapia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(competitors, eat asparagus)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(competitors, eat tilapia)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(competitors, eat asparagus)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(competitors, eat tilapia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(competitors, eat asparagus)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(competitors, eat asparagus)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(competitors, eat asparagus)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(competitors, eat asparagus)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(competitors, eat asparagus)