compilation: lack substantial value

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents collection
Weight: 0.59
, project
Weight: 0.58
, author
Weight: 0.56
, record
Weight: 0.54
Siblings album
Weight: 0.66
, computer database
Weight: 0.61
, recording
Weight: 0.31
, revision
Weight: 0.31
, band
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
lack substantial value 1.00
lack substantial monetary value 0.93
lack value 0.90
lack monetary value 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(compilation, lack substantial value)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(compilation, lack substantial value)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(compilation, lack substantial value)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(compilation, lack substantial monetary value)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(compilation, lack substantial value)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(compilation, lack substantial monetary value)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(compilation, lack substantial value)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(compilation, lack substantial monetary value)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(compilation, lack substantial value)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(compilation, lack value)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(compilation, lack substantial value)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(compilation, lack value)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(compilation, lack substantial value)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(compilation, lack value)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(compilation, lack substantial value)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(compilation, lack monetary value)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(compilation, lack substantial value)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(compilation, lack substantial monetary value)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(compilation, lack substantial value)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(compilation, lack monetary value)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(compilation, lack substantial value)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(compilation, lack monetary value)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(compilation, lack substantial value)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(compilation, lack monetary value)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(compilation, lack substantial value)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(compilation, lack value)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(compilation, lack substantial value)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(compilation, lack substantial value)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(compilation, lack substantial value)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(compilation, lack substantial value)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(compilation, lack substantial value)