compilation: lack value

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents collection
Weight: 0.59
, project
Weight: 0.58
, author
Weight: 0.56
, record
Weight: 0.54
Siblings album
Weight: 0.66
, computer database
Weight: 0.61
, recording
Weight: 0.31
, revision
Weight: 0.31
, band
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
lack value 1.00
lack substantial value 0.90
lack monetary value 0.86
lack substantial monetary value 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(compilation, lack value)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(compilation, lack value)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(compilation, lack value)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(compilation, lack monetary value)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(compilation, lack value)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(compilation, lack monetary value)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(compilation, lack value)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(compilation, lack monetary value)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(compilation, lack value)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(compilation, lack monetary value)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(compilation, lack value)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(compilation, lack substantial value)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(compilation, lack value)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(compilation, lack substantial monetary value)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(compilation, lack value)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(compilation, lack substantial monetary value)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(compilation, lack value)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(compilation, lack substantial monetary value)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(compilation, lack value)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(compilation, lack substantial monetary value)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(compilation, lack value)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(compilation, lack substantial value)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(compilation, lack value)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(compilation, lack substantial value)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(compilation, lack value)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(compilation, lack substantial value)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(compilation, lack value)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(compilation, lack value)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(compilation, lack value)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(compilation, lack value)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(compilation, lack value)