compost: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.63
, amendment
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.58
, raw material
Weight: 0.57
, waste
Weight: 0.56
Siblings composting
Weight: 0.35
, manure
Weight: 0.35
, fertilizer
Weight: 0.34
, trash bag
Weight: 0.34
, human waste
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality better 0.94
be of quality 0.90
has quality use 0.88
is good fertiliser 0.87
be of high quality 0.86
has quality making 0.84
has quality cost 0.82
be good for environment 0.80
has shape solid 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(amendment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(compost, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(compost, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(amendment, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(compost, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amendment, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(compost, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(trash bag, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(compost, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(manure, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(compost, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(composting, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(compost, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manure, is good fertiliser)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(amendment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(compost, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(compost, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(compost, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(composting, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(composting, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(compost, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(trash bag, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(trash bag, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(compost, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(manure, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(manure, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(compost, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(manure, is good fertiliser)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(manure, is good fertiliser)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(compost, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(compost, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(compost, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(compost, be good for environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(compost, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(compost, be good for environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(compost, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(compost, be good for environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(compost, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(compost, be good for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(compost, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(compost, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(compost, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(compost, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(compost, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(compost, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(amendment, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(compost, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(trash bag, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(compost, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(composting, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(compost, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(manure, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(compost, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(manure, is good fertiliser)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(compost, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(amendment, has quality good)