manure: is good fertiliser

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fertilizer
Weight: 0.62
, raw material
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.56
, option
Weight: 0.55
Siblings compost
Weight: 0.35
, ammonia
Weight: 0.35
, ammonium nitrate
Weight: 0.35
, dairy product
Weight: 0.34
, fecal matter
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good fertiliser 1.00
has quality good 0.87
be bad for environment 0.78
be good for plants 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fertilizer, be good for plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(manure, is good fertiliser)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(manure, is good fertiliser)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, be good for plants)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be good for plants)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ammonium nitrate, is good fertiliser)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ammonia, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(compost, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ammonia, be bad for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(compost, be good for plants)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(fertilizer, be good for plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(manure, is good fertiliser)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(manure, is good fertiliser)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(ammonium nitrate, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(ammonium nitrate, is good fertiliser)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(ammonia, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(ammonia, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(compost, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(compost, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(ammonia, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(ammonia, be bad for environment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(compost, be good for plants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(compost, be good for plants)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(manure, is good fertiliser)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(manure, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(manure, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(manure, be bad for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(manure, be bad for environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(manure, be bad for environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(manure, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(manure, be good for plants)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(manure, be good for plants)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(manure, be bad for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(manure, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(manure, be good for plants)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(manure, be good for plants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manure, is good fertiliser)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(manure, is good fertiliser)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fertilizer, be good for plants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ammonium nitrate, is good fertiliser)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(ammonia, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(compost, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(ammonia, be bad for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(compost, be good for plants)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(manure, is good fertiliser) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fertilizer, be good for plants)