fertilizer: be bad for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.64
, material
Weight: 0.63
, substance
Weight: 0.60
, chemical
Weight: 0.58
Siblings ammonium nitrate
Weight: 0.76
, ammonia
Weight: 0.70
, manure
Weight: 0.62
, potassium sulfate
Weight: 0.58
, flourish
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for environment 1.00
affect environment 0.87
be harmful to environment 0.86
harm environment 0.82
negatively impact environment 0.80
be bad for water 0.80
has quality bad 0.80
pollute environment 0.78
be bad for ocean 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(manure, be bad for environment)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ammonia, be bad for environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(flourish, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(manure, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(manure, be bad for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(flourish, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(flourish, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(ammonia, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(ammonia, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(fertilizer, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(fertilizer, affect environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(fertilizer, be bad for water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(fertilizer, be bad for water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(fertilizer, harm environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fertilizer, be harmful to environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, affect environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, harm environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(fertilizer, harm environment)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, be harmful to environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(fertilizer, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, harm environment)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(fertilizer, affect environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(fertilizer, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(fertilizer, be harmful to environment)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be harmful to environment)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, affect environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(fertilizer, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(manure, be bad for environment)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(ammonia, be bad for environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(flourish, has quality bad)