fertilizer: be bad for ocean

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.64
, material
Weight: 0.63
, substance
Weight: 0.60
, chemical
Weight: 0.58
Siblings ammonium nitrate
Weight: 0.76
, ammonia
Weight: 0.70
, manure
Weight: 0.62
, potassium sulfate
Weight: 0.58
, flourish
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for ocean 1.00
get to ocean 0.93
be bad for water 0.84
be bad for environment 0.77
affect lake 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(manure, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(ammonia, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(manure, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(manure, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(ammonia, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(ammonia, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, get to ocean)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(fertilizer, get to ocean)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, get to ocean)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for water)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for water)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(manure, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, be bad for ocean)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(ammonia, be bad for environment)