fertilizer: affect lake

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.64
, material
Weight: 0.63
, substance
Weight: 0.60
, chemical
Weight: 0.58
Siblings ammonium nitrate
Weight: 0.76
, ammonia
Weight: 0.70
, manure
Weight: 0.62
, potassium sulfate
Weight: 0.58
, flourish
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect lake 1.00
polute lakes 0.87
affect rivers 0.86
enter lakes 0.82
affect water quality 0.82
affect ph of waterways 0.80
affect water ecosystems 0.79
polute rivers 0.79
running into pond 0.79
affect turbidity 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(manure, enter lakes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(manure, enter lakes)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(manure, enter lakes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(fertilizer, affect lake)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, polute lakes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(fertilizer, polute lakes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, polute lakes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(fertilizer, enter lakes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, enter lakes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, enter lakes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, affect water ecosystems)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fertilizer, enter lakes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, affect rivers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(fertilizer, polute lakes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(fertilizer, affect water ecosystems)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(fertilizer, affect water ecosystems)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(fertilizer, affect rivers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, affect rivers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, affect water ecosystems)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, affect ph of waterways)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(fertilizer, affect ph of waterways)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(fertilizer, affect water quality)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, affect water quality)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(fertilizer, affect water quality)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, affect ph of waterways)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fertilizer, affect rivers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(fertilizer, affect ph of waterways)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, affect water quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, affect turbidity)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fertilizer, affect turbidity)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, affect turbidity)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(fertilizer, affect turbidity)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, affect lake)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(fertilizer, affect lake)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, affect lake)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(manure, enter lakes)