fertilizer: affect rivers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.64
, material
Weight: 0.63
, substance
Weight: 0.60
, chemical
Weight: 0.58
Siblings ammonium nitrate
Weight: 0.76
, ammonia
Weight: 0.70
, manure
Weight: 0.62
, potassium sulfate
Weight: 0.58
, flourish
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect rivers 1.00
polute rivers 0.96
enter rivers 0.90
affect ph of waterways 0.86
affect lake 0.86
polute lakes 0.84
affect water ecosystems 0.83
enter lakes 0.81
affect water quality 0.80
cause water pollution 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, affect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(manure, enter rivers)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, affect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(manure, enter lakes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(fertilizer, affect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(manure, enter rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(manure, enter rivers)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(fertilizer, affect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(manure, enter lakes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(manure, enter lakes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(fertilizer, affect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(fertilizer, affect rivers)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(fertilizer, affect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, enter rivers)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(fertilizer, affect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fertilizer, enter rivers)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(fertilizer, affect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, enter rivers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(fertilizer, affect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fertilizer, affect lake)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(fertilizer, affect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, affect lake)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(fertilizer, affect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fertilizer, affect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, affect rivers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(fertilizer, affect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fertilizer, affect rivers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, affect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(manure, enter rivers)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(fertilizer, affect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(manure, enter lakes)