composting: is valuable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.62
, way
Weight: 0.61
, process
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, practice
Weight: 0.58
Siblings compost
Weight: 0.35
, waste
Weight: 0.34
, gardening
Weight: 0.34
, fermentation
Weight: 0.33
, organic chemistry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is valuable 1.00
is useful 0.83
be valuable addition to soil 0.82
is important to 0.81
be valuable to gardeners 0.77
is beneficial 0.76
be important in the 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(composting, is valuable)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(method, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(method, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(compost, be valuable addition to soil)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(compost, be valuable to gardeners)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fermentation, is useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(organic chemistry, is useful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(organic chemistry, is important to)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(organic chemistry, be important in the)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(composting, is valuable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(organic chemistry, is useful)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(organic chemistry, is useful)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(fermentation, is useful)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(fermentation, is useful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(organic chemistry, is important to)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(organic chemistry, is important to)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(compost, be valuable addition to soil)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(compost, be valuable addition to soil)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(organic chemistry, be important in the)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(organic chemistry, be important in the)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(compost, be valuable to gardeners)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(compost, be valuable to gardeners)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(composting, is valuable)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(composting, is useful)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(composting, is useful)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(composting, is useful)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(composting, is beneficial)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(composting, is beneficial)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(composting, is beneficial)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(composting, is useful)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(composting, is beneficial)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(composting, is valuable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(composting, is valuable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(method, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(organic chemistry, is important to)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(organic chemistry, is useful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(organic chemistry, be important in the)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fermentation, is useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(compost, be valuable addition to soil)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(compost, be valuable to gardeners)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(composting, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(method, is useful)