method: is useful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents approach
Weight: 0.72
, standard
Weight: 0.66
, option
Weight: 0.65
, tool
Weight: 0.61
Siblings algorithm
Weight: 0.69
, extraction
Weight: 0.67
, strategy
Weight: 0.67
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.66
, spray
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is useful 1.00
were helpful to people 0.82
overload useful 0.79
were helpful to early people 0.79
be usefull 0.76
be called tool 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(approach, is useful)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(method, is useful)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(method, is useful)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tool, were helpful to people)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(method, is useful)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tool, be usefull)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(method, is useful)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tool, be called tool)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(method, is useful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(tool, be called tool)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(approach, is useful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(tool, be usefull)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tool, were helpful to people)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(approach, is useful)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tool, be usefull)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(tool, be called tool)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(approach, is useful)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(method, is useful)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tool, were helpful to people)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(method, is useful)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(method, is useful)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(tool, be usefull)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(method, is useful)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(tool, be called tool)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(method, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(method, is useful)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(method, overload useful)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(method, overload useful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(method, overload useful)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(method, overload useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(method, is useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(method, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(tool, be called tool)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tool, be usefull)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(approach, is useful)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to people)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(tool, be called tool)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(approach, is useful)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(tool, be usefull)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to people)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(method, is useful)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)