compressor: fail

Related concepts

Parents	equipment Weight: 0.64 , device Weight: 0.62 , application Weight: 0.59 , circuit Weight: 0.59 , machinery Weight: 0.59
Siblings	condenser Weight: 0.35 , transformer Weight: 0.35 , ventilation system Weight: 0.35 , diesel engine Weight: 0.35 , valve Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
fail	1.00
keep failing	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(compressor, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(transformer, fail)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(compressor, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(condenser, fail)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(compressor, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(valve, fail)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(compressor, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(transformer, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(transformer, fail)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(compressor, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(condenser, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(condenser, fail)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(compressor, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(valve, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(valve, fail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(compressor, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(compressor, fail)

Similarity expansion

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.65

Typical(compressor, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(compressor, keep failing)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(compressor, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Remarkable(compressor, keep failing)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(compressor, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(compressor, keep failing)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(compressor, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(compressor, keep failing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Salient(compressor, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(compressor, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(compressor, fail)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(compressor, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(compressor, fail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(compressor, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(condenser, fail)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(compressor, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(transformer, fail)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(compressor, fail) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(valve, fail)