compressor: keep failing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents equipment
Weight: 0.64
, device
Weight: 0.62
, application
Weight: 0.59
, circuit
Weight: 0.59
, machinery
Weight: 0.59
Siblings condenser
Weight: 0.35
, transformer
Weight: 0.35
, ventilation system
Weight: 0.35
, diesel engine
Weight: 0.35
, valve
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
keep failing 1.00
fail 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(compressor, keep failing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(transformer, fail)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(compressor, keep failing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(condenser, fail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(compressor, keep failing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(valve, fail)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(compressor, keep failing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(transformer, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(transformer, fail)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(compressor, keep failing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(condenser, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(condenser, fail)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(compressor, keep failing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(valve, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(valve, fail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(compressor, keep failing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(compressor, keep failing)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(compressor, keep failing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(compressor, fail)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(compressor, keep failing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(compressor, fail)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(compressor, keep failing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(compressor, fail)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(compressor, keep failing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(compressor, fail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(compressor, keep failing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(compressor, keep failing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(compressor, keep failing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(compressor, keep failing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(compressor, keep failing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(compressor, keep failing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(condenser, fail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(compressor, keep failing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(transformer, fail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(compressor, keep failing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(valve, fail)