computer monitor: be at desk

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer
Weight: 0.81
, electronic device
Weight: 0.79
, device
Weight: 0.74
, equipment
Weight: 0.72
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.41
, computer network
Weight: 0.40
, personal computer
Weight: 0.40
, computer program
Weight: 0.39
, computer virus
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at desk 1.00
be at on desk 0.98
be put on table or desk 0.89
be used to use up desk space 0.85
be more expensive than desk top computer 0.80
be at in office 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(computer, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be at desk)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(computer, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be at desk)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(computer, be at in office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be at desk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(computer, be at on desk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(computer, be at desk)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(computer, be at in office)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(computer, be at on desk)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(computer, be at desk)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(computer, be at in office)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(personal computer, be at desk)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desk top computer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(computer, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be at desk)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(computer, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be at desk)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(computer, be at in office) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be at desk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(personal computer, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(personal computer, be at desk)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desk top computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(laptop computer, be more expensive than desk top computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(computer monitor, be at desk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be at desk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be at desk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(computer, be at desk)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(computer, be at on desk)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(computer, be at in office)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(personal computer, be at desk)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(laptop computer, be more expensive than desk top computer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(computer, be at desk)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(computer, be at on desk)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(computer, be at in office)