computer: be at on desk

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents personal computer
Weight: 0.79
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.76
, digital camera
Weight: 0.71
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.67
Siblings computer monitor
Weight: 0.81
, computer virus
Weight: 0.78
, computer programmer
Weight: 0.74
, computer program
Weight: 0.72
, computer network
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at on desk 1.00
be at desk 0.98
be put on table or desk 0.91
be used to use up desk space 0.86
be at in office 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(personal computer, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(computer, be at on desk)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(computer, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(personal computer, be at desk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(computer, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(personal computer, be at desk)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(computer, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be at desk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(personal computer, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(computer, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(computer, be at on desk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(computer, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be at desk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(computer, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(computer, be at on desk)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(computer, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(computer, be at desk)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(computer, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(computer, be at desk)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(computer, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(computer, be at desk)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(computer, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(computer, be at in office)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(computer, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(computer, be at desk)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(computer, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(computer, be at in office)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(computer, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(computer, be at in office)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(computer, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(computer, be at in office)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(computer, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(computer, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(computer, be at on desk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(computer, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(computer, be at on desk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(computer, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(personal computer, be at desk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(computer, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be at desk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(computer, be at on desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(personal computer, be at desk)