computer programming: is complicated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer
Weight: 0.75
, programming
Weight: 0.71
, service
Weight: 0.67
, language
Weight: 0.67
, activity
Weight: 0.63
Siblings computer programmer
Weight: 0.40
, programming language
Weight: 0.40
, computer network
Weight: 0.40
, computer program
Weight: 0.39
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
is complicated 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(programming, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(computer programming, is complicated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(computer programming, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(programming, is complicated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(computer programming, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(programming, is complicated)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(computer programming, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(programming language, is complicated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(programming, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(computer programming, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(computer programming, is complicated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(computer programming, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(programming language, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(programming language, is complicated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(computer programming, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(computer programming, is complicated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(computer programming, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(computer programming, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(computer programming, is complicated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(computer programming, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(computer programming, is complicated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(computer programming, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(programming, is complicated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(computer programming, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(programming language, is complicated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(computer programming, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(programming, is complicated)