computer user: be at internet cafe

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents user
Weight: 0.67
, information
Weight: 0.56
, program
Weight: 0.50
, everyone
Weight: 0.50
Siblings computer programmer
Weight: 0.81
, customer
Weight: 0.65
, computer database
Weight: 0.35
, computer file
Weight: 0.34
, free software
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at internet cafe 1.00
be at on internet 0.86
be find in restaurant 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(information, be at on internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(computer user, be at internet cafe)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(computer user, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(information, be at on internet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(information, be at on internet)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(customer, be at internet cafe)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(customer, be find in restaurant)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(information, be at on internet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(computer user, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(computer user, be at internet cafe)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(computer user, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(customer, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(customer, be at internet cafe)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(computer user, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(customer, be find in restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(customer, be find in restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(computer user, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(computer user, be at internet cafe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(computer user, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(computer user, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at internet cafe)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(computer user, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(computer user, be at internet cafe)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(information, be at on internet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(customer, be at internet cafe)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(customer, be find in restaurant)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(computer user, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(information, be at on internet)