customer: be find in restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer user
Weight: 0.65
, fan
Weight: 0.64
, constituent
Weight: 0.63
, business
Weight: 0.61
Siblings employer
Weight: 0.63
, intel
Weight: 0.60
, asset
Weight: 0.59
, operator
Weight: 0.59
, citizen
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be find in restaurant 1.00
be find in shop 0.85
be at bar 0.77
be at internet cafe 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(computer user, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(customer, be find in restaurant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(customer, be find in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(computer user, be at internet cafe)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(customer, be find in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at internet cafe)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(computer user, be at internet cafe)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(customer, be find in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(customer, be find in restaurant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(customer, be find in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(customer, be find in restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(customer, be find in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(customer, be at bar)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(customer, be find in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(customer, be at internet cafe)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(customer, be find in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(customer, be find in shop)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(customer, be find in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(customer, be at bar)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(customer, be find in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(customer, be at internet cafe)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(customer, be find in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(customer, be find in shop)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(customer, be find in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(customer, be at internet cafe)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(customer, be find in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(customer, be at bar)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(customer, be find in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(customer, be find in shop)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(customer, be find in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(customer, be at bar)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(customer, be find in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(customer, be at internet cafe)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(customer, be find in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(customer, be find in shop)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(customer, be find in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(customer, be find in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(customer, be find in restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(customer, be find in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(customer, be find in restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(customer, be find in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(computer user, be at internet cafe)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(customer, be find in restaurant)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(computer user, be at internet cafe)