customer: be find in shop

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer user
Weight: 0.65
, fan
Weight: 0.64
, constituent
Weight: 0.63
, business
Weight: 0.61
Siblings employer
Weight: 0.63
, intel
Weight: 0.60
, asset
Weight: 0.59
, operator
Weight: 0.59
, citizen
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be find in shop 1.00
be find in restaurant 0.85
be at computer store 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(computer user, be at computer store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(customer, be find in shop)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(customer, be find in shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(computer user, be at computer store)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(customer, be find in shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(computer user, be at computer store)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(computer user, be at computer store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(customer, be find in shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(customer, be find in shop)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(customer, be find in shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(customer, be find in shop)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(customer, be find in shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(customer, be find in restaurant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(customer, be find in shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(customer, be find in restaurant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(customer, be find in shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(customer, be find in restaurant)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(customer, be find in shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(customer, be find in restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(customer, be find in shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(customer, be find in shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(customer, be find in shop)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(customer, be find in shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(customer, be find in shop)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(customer, be find in shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(computer user, be at computer store)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(customer, be find in shop) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(computer user, be at computer store)