customer: be at bar

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer user
Weight: 0.65
, fan
Weight: 0.64
, constituent
Weight: 0.63
, business
Weight: 0.61
Siblings employer
Weight: 0.63
, intel
Weight: 0.60
, asset
Weight: 0.59
, operator
Weight: 0.59
, citizen
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at bar 1.00
be find in restaurant 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(customer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(customer, be at bar)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(customer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(customer, be find in restaurant)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(customer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(customer, be find in restaurant)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(customer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(customer, be find in restaurant)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(customer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(customer, be find in restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(customer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(customer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(customer, be at bar)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(customer, be at bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(customer, be at bar)