computer virus: be appropriately called viruses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer network
Weight: 0.79
, computer
Weight: 0.78
, virus
Weight: 0.75
, computer program
Weight: 0.73
, security
Weight: 0.64
Siblings trojan horse
Weight: 0.74
, worm
Weight: 0.66
, trojan
Weight: 0.62
, computer game
Weight: 0.39
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be appropriately called viruses 1.00
be like viruses 0.86
is call viruses 0.84
be called computer viruses 0.84
has state viruses 0.83
be like biological viruses 0.81
be malware created 0.78
be malware 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer virus, is call viruses)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer virus, be called computer viruses)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(computer virus, be like viruses)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(computer virus, be like viruses)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer virus, is call viruses)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(computer virus, is call viruses)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer virus, be called computer viruses)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(computer virus, be called computer viruses)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(computer virus, be like viruses)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(computer virus, has state viruses)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(computer virus, be like biological viruses)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(computer virus, be like biological viruses)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(computer virus, be malware created)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(computer virus, be like biological viruses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(computer virus, be malware)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(computer virus, be malware created)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer virus, has state viruses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(computer virus, be malware)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(computer virus, has state viruses)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(computer virus, be malware created)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(computer virus, be malware)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has state viruses)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, be like viruses)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, be like biological viruses)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, is call viruses)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, be called computer viruses)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, be malware created)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, be malware)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(computer virus, be appropriately called viruses)