computer virus: has quality jokes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer network
Weight: 0.79
, computer
Weight: 0.78
, virus
Weight: 0.75
, computer program
Weight: 0.73
, security
Weight: 0.64
Siblings trojan horse
Weight: 0.74
, worm
Weight: 0.66
, trojan
Weight: 0.62
, computer game
Weight: 0.39
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality jokes 1.00
has quality joke 0.91
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer program, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(computer virus, has quality jokes)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(computer network, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(computer virus, has quality jokes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(computer program, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(computer program, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(worm, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(computer game, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(trojan, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer program, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(computer virus, has quality jokes)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(computer network, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(computer virus, has quality jokes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(trojan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(trojan, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(computer game, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(computer game, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(worm, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(worm, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(computer virus, has quality jokes)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer virus, has quality joke)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(computer virus, has quality joke)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(computer virus, has quality joke)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(computer virus, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality joke)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(computer virus, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(computer virus, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality jokes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(computer virus, has quality jokes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(trojan, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(worm, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(computer game, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(computer virus, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality bad)