conclusion: has quality questions

Related concepts

Parents	recommendation Weight: 0.67 , part Weight: 0.61 , interpretation Weight: 0.61 , statement Weight: 0.60 , thing Weight: 0.60
Siblings	hyperbole Weight: 0.50 , decision Weight: 0.35 , opinion Weight: 0.33 , judgment day Weight: 0.32 , assumption Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality questions	1.00
has quality bad	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(interpretation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(conclusion, has quality questions)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(conclusion, has quality questions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(conclusion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(recommendation, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(conclusion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(interpretation, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(conclusion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(recommendation, has quality bad)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(conclusion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(interpretation, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(conclusion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(opinion, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(conclusion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(assumption, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(interpretation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(conclusion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(conclusion, has quality questions)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.68

Plausible(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(conclusion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(conclusion, has quality questions)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(conclusion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

Remarkable(opinion, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(opinion, has quality bad)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(conclusion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(assumption, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(assumption, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(conclusion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(conclusion, has quality questions)

Similarity expansion

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(conclusion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(conclusion, has quality bad)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(conclusion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(conclusion, has quality bad)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(conclusion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(conclusion, has quality bad)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(conclusion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(conclusion, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Salient(conclusion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(conclusion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(conclusion, has quality questions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(conclusion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(conclusion, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(conclusion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(recommendation, has quality bad)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(conclusion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(interpretation, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(conclusion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(opinion, has quality bad)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(conclusion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(assumption, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(conclusion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(recommendation, has quality bad)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(conclusion, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(interpretation, has quality bad)