recommendation: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.65
, statement
Weight: 0.64
, form
Weight: 0.62
, rule
Weight: 0.62
Siblings decision
Weight: 0.76
, opinion
Weight: 0.70
, conclusion
Weight: 0.67
, committee
Weight: 0.64
, policy
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality worth 0.82
has quality questions 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(opinion, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(conclusion, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(committee, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(committee, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(opinion, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(policy, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(conclusion, has quality questions)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(opinion, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(committee, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(committee, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(opinion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(opinion, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(committee, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(committee, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(policy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(policy, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(opinion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(opinion, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(conclusion, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(conclusion, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(opinion, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(opinion, has quality worth)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(conclusion, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(conclusion, has quality questions)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(recommendation, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(recommendation, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(recommendation, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(opinion, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(opinion, has quality worth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(committee, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(opinion, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(committee, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(policy, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(conclusion, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(recommendation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(conclusion, has quality questions)