policy: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	agreement Weight: 0.65 , strategy Weight: 0.63 , recommendation Weight: 0.61 , duty Weight: 0.60
Siblings	interest rate Weight: 0.67 , bill Weight: 0.67 , proposal Weight: 0.66 , report Weight: 0.65 , prohibition Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
make great	0.80
was bad	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(strategy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(policy, has quality good)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(policy, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(policy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(agreement, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(policy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(strategy, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(policy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(policy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(strategy, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(policy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(prohibition, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(policy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(strategy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(policy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(policy, has quality good)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(policy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(policy, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(policy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

Remarkable(prohibition, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(prohibition, has quality good)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(policy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(prohibition, was bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(policy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(policy, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(policy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(policy, make great)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(policy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(policy, make great)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(policy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(policy, make great)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(policy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(policy, make great)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(policy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(policy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(policy, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(policy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(policy, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(policy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(agreement, has quality good)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(policy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(strategy, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(policy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(prohibition, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(policy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(prohibition, was bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(policy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(agreement, has quality good)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

Typical(policy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(strategy, has quality good)