prohibition: was bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents law
Weight: 0.66
, policy
Weight: 0.65
, rule
Weight: 0.65
, provision
Weight: 0.62
, movement
Weight: 0.60
Siblings common law
Weight: 0.36
, ordinance
Weight: 0.36
, amendment
Weight: 0.35
, legislation
Weight: 0.34
, mandate
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was bad 1.00
was good 0.92
has quality bad 0.85
was hard 0.80
is good thing 0.79
was important to 1920s 0.79
was good for america 0.77
was difficult 0.77
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(movement, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(prohibition, was bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(provision, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(prohibition, was bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(prohibition, was bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(policy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(prohibition, was bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(provision, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(movement, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(policy, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(provision, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(movement, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(policy, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(amendment, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ordinance, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(common law, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(legislation, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amendment, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(movement, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(provision, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(policy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(common law, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(common law, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(amendment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(amendment, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(mandate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(mandate, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(legislation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(legislation, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(amendment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(amendment, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(common law, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(common law, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(mandate, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(mandate, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(ordinance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ordinance, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(prohibition, was bad)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(prohibition, was good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(prohibition, is good thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(prohibition, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(prohibition, was good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(prohibition, was hard)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(prohibition, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(prohibition, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(prohibition, was difficult)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(prohibition, is good thing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(prohibition, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(prohibition, is good thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was hard)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(prohibition, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(prohibition, was important to 1920s)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(prohibition, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(prohibition, was hard)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(prohibition, was good for america)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was difficult)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(prohibition, was difficult)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(prohibition, was important to 1920s)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(prohibition, was good for america)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was important to 1920s)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was good for america)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was good for america)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was important to 1920s)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was hard)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, is good thing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was difficult)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(prohibition, was bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(policy, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(provision, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(movement, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(provision, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(common law, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(ordinance, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(legislation, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(amendment, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(amendment, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mandate, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(common law, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mandate, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(provision, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(movement, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(policy, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(prohibition, was bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(provision, has quality good)