prohibition: was hard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents law
Weight: 0.66
, policy
Weight: 0.65
, rule
Weight: 0.65
, provision
Weight: 0.62
, movement
Weight: 0.60
Siblings common law
Weight: 0.36
, ordinance
Weight: 0.36
, amendment
Weight: 0.35
, legislation
Weight: 0.34
, mandate
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was hard 1.00
is hard 0.96
was difficult 0.85
was good 0.83
was bad 0.80
was important to 1920s 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(amendment, is hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(amendment, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(amendment, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(prohibition, was hard)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, is hard)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(prohibition, is hard)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(prohibition, is hard)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was difficult)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(prohibition, is hard)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(prohibition, was difficult)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was important to 1920s)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(prohibition, was good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(prohibition, was bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was difficult)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(prohibition, was difficult)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(prohibition, was important to 1920s)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was important to 1920s)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(prohibition, was important to 1920s)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(prohibition, was bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(prohibition, was good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(prohibition, was hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(amendment, is hard)