prohibition: was good for america

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents law
Weight: 0.66
, policy
Weight: 0.65
, rule
Weight: 0.65
, provision
Weight: 0.62
, movement
Weight: 0.60
Siblings common law
Weight: 0.36
, ordinance
Weight: 0.36
, amendment
Weight: 0.35
, legislation
Weight: 0.34
, mandate
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was good for america 1.00
was brought in in america 0.89
be important to canadian history 0.79
was good 0.78
be important in canada 0.78
was bad 0.77
is good thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(prohibition, was good for america)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(prohibition, was brought in in america)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(prohibition, was brought in in america)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was brought in in america)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(prohibition, be important in canada)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, be important in canada)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was brought in in america)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(prohibition, be important to canadian history)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, be important to canadian history)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(prohibition, be important in canada)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(prohibition, is good thing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(prohibition, was good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(prohibition, was bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(prohibition, is good thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(prohibition, is good thing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(prohibition, be important to canadian history)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(prohibition, be important in canada)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(prohibition, be important to canadian history)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(prohibition, was bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, is good thing)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(prohibition, was good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was good for america)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(prohibition, was good for america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(prohibition, was good for america)