provision: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents amendment
Weight: 0.77
, section
Weight: 0.62
, limitation
Weight: 0.62
, clause
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bill
Weight: 0.74
, measure
Weight: 0.70
, legislation
Weight: 0.70
, resolution
Weight: 0.65
, modification
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is good fortnite 0.87
is great 0.81
affect quality 0.81
is good thing 0.78
has quality evil 0.78
be bad for environment 0.77
has quality questions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(amendment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(provision, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(clause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(provision, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(amendment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(provision, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(limitation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(provision, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(limitation, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(amendment, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(amendment, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(clause, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(limitation, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(amendment, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(clause, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amendment, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(modification, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(legislation, has quality evil)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(modification, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(resolution, is good fortnite)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(legislation, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(resolution, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(resolution, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(modification, is good thing)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(legislation, has quality questions)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(resolution, affect quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(amendment, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(provision, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(clause, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(provision, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(amendment, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(provision, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(limitation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(provision, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(legislation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(legislation, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(resolution, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(resolution, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(modification, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(modification, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(resolution, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(resolution, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(resolution, is good fortnite) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(resolution, is good fortnite)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(resolution, affect quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(resolution, affect quality)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(legislation, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(legislation, has quality questions)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(modification, be bad for environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(modification, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(modification, is good thing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(legislation, has quality evil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(legislation, has quality evil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(provision, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(provision, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(provision, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(provision, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(provision, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(limitation, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(amendment, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(clause, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(amendment, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(resolution, affect quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(modification, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(legislation, has quality questions)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(legislation, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(resolution, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(resolution, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(modification, is good thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(modification, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(resolution, is good fortnite)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(legislation, has quality evil)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(amendment, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(limitation, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(clause, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(provision, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(amendment, has quality bad)