resolution: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.69
, agreement
Weight: 0.68
, document
Weight: 0.67
, provision
Weight: 0.65
Siblings council
Weight: 0.67
, proposal
Weight: 0.66
, end
Weight: 0.61
, amendment
Weight: 0.36
, bill
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality better 0.94
is good fortnite 0.87
affect quality 0.81
has quality definition 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(provision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(resolution, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(resolution, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(agreement, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(provision, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amendment, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(council, has quality definition)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(provision, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(resolution, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(agreement, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(resolution, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(amendment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(amendment, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(council, has quality definition)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(council, has quality definition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(resolution, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(resolution, has quality better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(resolution, has quality better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(resolution, has quality better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(resolution, affect quality)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(resolution, has quality better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(resolution, is good fortnite)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(resolution, is good fortnite)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(resolution, affect quality)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(resolution, affect quality)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(resolution, is good fortnite)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(resolution, affect quality)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(resolution, is good fortnite)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(resolution, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(resolution, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(agreement, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(provision, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(amendment, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(council, has quality definition)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(agreement, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(resolution, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(provision, has quality good)