modification: be bad for environment

Related concepts

Parents	revision Weight: 0.67 , provision Weight: 0.64 , document Weight: 0.60 , condition Weight: 0.59
Siblings	correction Weight: 0.64 , structure Weight: 0.63 , adaptation Weight: 0.59 , deletion Weight: 0.59 , linkage Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be bad for environment	1.00
fit environment	0.81
has quality bad	0.80
be in desert environment	0.79
be related to environments	0.78
is bad people	0.78
is good thing	0.77
has quality good	0.77
is bad people are eating	0.75
be important for business	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(provision, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(modification, be bad for environment)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(provision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(modification, be bad for environment)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(document, be important for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(modification, be bad for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(provision, has quality bad)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(provision, has quality good)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(document, be important for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality bad)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(provision, has quality good)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(document, be important for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(adaptation, be in desert environment)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(adaptation, fit environment)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(structure, has quality good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(adaptation, be related to environments)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.65

Plausible(provision, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(modification, be bad for environment)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Plausible(provision, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(modification, be bad for environment)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(document, be important for business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(modification, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

Remarkable(adaptation, be related to environments) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(adaptation, be related to environments)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(adaptation, be in desert environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(adaptation, be in desert environment)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(adaptation, fit environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(adaptation, fit environment)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(structure, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(structure, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(modification, be bad for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(modification, is good thing)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(modification, has quality good)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(modification, has quality good)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(modification, is good thing)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.12

Remarkable(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(modification, is good thing)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.11

Salient(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(modification, is good thing)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(modification, has quality good)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.11

Salient(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(modification, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.11

Salient(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(modification, be bad for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.09

Plausible(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(modification, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(provision, has quality bad)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(provision, has quality good)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(document, be important for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(adaptation, be related to environments)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(adaptation, be in desert environment)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(adaptation, fit environment)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(provision, has quality bad)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(document, be important for business)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.32

Typical(modification, be bad for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(provision, has quality good)