concrete: is composite material

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flooring
Weight: 0.69
, raw material
Weight: 0.63
, substance
Weight: 0.62
, stone
Weight: 0.60
, surface
Weight: 0.60
Siblings asphalt
Weight: 0.55
, granite
Weight: 0.35
, steel
Weight: 0.35
, tile
Weight: 0.35
, kidney stone
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is composite material 1.00
is material 0.84
is building material 0.81
be as building material 0.81
is good building material 0.80
was building material 0.80
is important building material 0.79
was useful building material 0.79
was building material to romans 0.76
was useful building material to romans 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stone, is good building material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(concrete, is composite material)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(concrete, is composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(stone, is good building material)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(stone, is good building material)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(granite, is good building material)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(granite, is building material)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stone, is good building material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(concrete, is composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(concrete, is composite material)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(concrete, is composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(granite, is building material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(granite, is building material)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(concrete, is composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(granite, is good building material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(granite, is good building material)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(concrete, is composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(concrete, is composite material)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(concrete, is composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is building material)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(concrete, is composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is good building material)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(concrete, is composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(concrete, be as building material)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(concrete, is composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(concrete, was building material)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(concrete, is composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(concrete, is building material)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(concrete, is composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(concrete, is composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is composite material)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(concrete, is composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(concrete, is composite material)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(stone, is good building material)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(granite, is building material)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(granite, is good building material)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(concrete, is composite material) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(stone, is good building material)