stone: is good building material

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artifact
Weight: 0.63
, substance
Weight: 0.59
, vessel
Weight: 0.58
, medium
Weight: 0.58
, garden
Weight: 0.57
Siblings concrete
Weight: 0.60
, stele
Weight: 0.36
, vegetable garden
Weight: 0.32
, pottery
Weight: 0.32
, coin
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good building material 1.00
be in building 0.86
be in building important 0.86
was for pyramid transportated to building site 0.80
was for pyramid transported to building site 0.79
be transported to building site 0.78
get on top of buildings 0.76
be used in concrete 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(concrete, is good building material)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(concrete, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(concrete, is good building material)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(stone, is good building material)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(stone, be in building)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(stone, be in building)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(stone, be in building)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(stone, be in building)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(stone, be used in concrete)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(stone, be used in concrete)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(stone, be used in concrete)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(stone, be used in concrete)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(stone, get on top of buildings)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(stone, be in building important)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(stone, get on top of buildings)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(stone, be in building important)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(stone, get on top of buildings)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(stone, was for pyramid transportated to building site)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(stone, be transported to building site)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(stone, be in building important)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(stone, was for pyramid transported to building site)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(stone, be in building important)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(stone, be transported to building site)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(stone, was for pyramid transportated to building site)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(stone, was for pyramid transported to building site)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(stone, was for pyramid transportated to building site)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(stone, be transported to building site)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(stone, was for pyramid transported to building site)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(stone, be transported to building site)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(stone, was for pyramid transportated to building site)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(stone, was for pyramid transported to building site)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(stone, get on top of buildings)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(stone, is good building material)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(stone, is good building material)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(stone, is good building material)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(concrete, is good building material)