concussion: has quality effects

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents injury
Weight: 0.67
, condition
Weight: 0.63
, head
Weight: 0.61
, trauma
Weight: 0.58
Siblings knee
Weight: 0.37
, hamstring
Weight: 0.36
, whiplash
Weight: 0.36
, achilles tendon
Weight: 0.36
, fracture
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality effects 1.00
effects 0.94
have effect 0.79
has quality bad 0.76
has quality loss 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(injury, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(concussion, has quality effects)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(injury, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(injury, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fracture, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(hamstring, has quality bad)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(whiplash, have effect)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(injury, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(concussion, has quality effects)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(whiplash, have effect)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(whiplash, have effect)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(hamstring, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(hamstring, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(fracture, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(fracture, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(concussion, has quality effects)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(concussion, effects)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(concussion, effects)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(concussion, effects)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(concussion, effects)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(concussion, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(concussion, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(concussion, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(concussion, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(concussion, has quality effects)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(concussion, has quality effects)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(injury, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(whiplash, have effect)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(hamstring, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fracture, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(concussion, has quality effects)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(injury, has quality bad)